<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adjacentReality</title>
	<link>http://adjacentreality.com</link>
	<description>Wisdom and Knowledge sent forth in the realm adjacent to reality...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Einstein&#8217;s Postulates; Gravity and Light</title>
		<link>http://adjacentreality.com/einsteins-postulates-gravity-and-light/</link>
		<comments>http://adjacentreality.com/einsteins-postulates-gravity-and-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Light</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Gravity</dc:subject><dc:subject></dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adjacentreality.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading a few chapters of Brooke&#8217;s book, &#8220;Time Travel in Einstein&#8217;s Universe,&#8221; I realized how much more his postulates made sense. It was hard for me to conceptualize light always traveling the speed of light. I now realized that within the object that is traveling, time itself slows down, causing the light to continue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://adjacentreality.com/einsteins-postulates-gravity-and-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed of light my butt</title>
		<link>http://adjacentreality.com/speed-of-light-my-butt/</link>
		<comments>http://adjacentreality.com/speed-of-light-my-butt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Light</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Atomics</dc:subject><dc:subject></dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adjacentreality.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a metre(er) is defined as the length that light travels in 1/299792458 of a second&#8230; Which is pretty stupid, since we don&#8217;t even know if light is constant..
So in the flashlight scenario [flashlight moving backwards at c, light shining back, and apparently (according to the theory of relativity) it would be moving at light [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://adjacentreality.com/speed-of-light-my-butt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Speed of Light</title>
		<link>http://adjacentreality.com/on-the-speed-of-light/</link>
		<comments>http://adjacentreality.com/on-the-speed-of-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 04:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Theories</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Light</dc:subject><dc:subject></dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adjacentreality.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was doing some research for my English paper, and I was reading a book about the theory of relativity. That got me thinking about Einstein&#8217;s &#8220;Riding on a ray of light&#8221; idea, and what if the ray of light was shining, being mounted on something moving? Would the speed of the light change? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://adjacentreality.com/on-the-speed-of-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
